Answer

Nigel.

Only my new theory can properly explain the results I claim to get from my experiment.
(It doesn't matter that other people who do the same experiment get different results.)
(My new theory contradicts the best established theory in biological science.)
My results justify throwing out the best established theory in biological science.

Millicent.

(Other scientists who do Nigel's experiment get different results from those claimed by Nigel.)
(Nigel's claimed results can only be explained by Nigel's theory.)
Nigel's new theory contradicts the best established theory in biological science.
(We should only overturn a theory when the majority of scientists get results that contradict that theory.)
Nigel's claimed results do not justify overturning the best established theory in biological science.

Opposing argument.

Nigel commits the fallacy of special pleading. He wants his theory to be accepted on the extremely flimsy grounds that he, and only he, gets results that are consistent with it, and yet he wants the other theory to be rejected even though it is the best established theory in biological science.

Use your browser's "back" key to return to your place in the reading.

---

This Site is Proudly Hosted By: