Answer

Robert: I really don't see why I should believe in Vuntag, after all, there really isn't any concrete evidence of her existence.
Mary: But you are ignoring the fact that Vuntag condemns all unbelievers to an eternity of being forced to watch Dukes of Hazzard reruns! So you'd better believe in Vuntag or you will find yourself spending all of eternity having to watch Bo and Luke foil Sheriff Lobo.

There is no concrete evidence of the existence of Vuntag.
(No one has to believe in things for which there is no concrete evidence.)
Vuntag doesn't exist. (Burden of proof -- direct argument.)

There's a couple of ways of interpreting Mary's statement as an argument. The simplest way is to standardize it like this.

If Vuntag exists, she punishes all unbelievers by forcing them to watch Dukes of Hazzard reruns eternally.
(There is no way for unbelievers to avoid the psychotically small-minded revenge of Vuntag, if she exists.)
(An eternity of watching the Dukes of Hazzard is a very bad thing.)
Vuntag exists. (opposing argument.)

Notice that nothing in this argument even remotely supports the claim that Vuntag exists. All it does is make one hideous threat that would only be meaningful if Vuntag actually existed. Which means that we would have to assume that Vuntag exists in order to make the argument work. Which means that a better way to standardize it would be as follows.

Vuntag exists.
Vuntag punishes all unbelievers by forcing them to watch Dukes of Hazzard reruns eternally.
(There is no way for unbelievers to avoid the psychotically small-minded revenge of Vuntag.)
(An eternity of watching the Dukes of Hazzard is a very bad thing.)
Vuntag exists. (opposing argument.)

But since the first premise is the same as the conclusion, this argument begs the question.

Fist of Death
Based on the logic presented by Robert and Mary, Vuntag does not exist. As with any supernatural being, our initial presumption must be that Vuntag does not exist since all the evidence we have strongly supports the position that no supernatural beings exist. Therefore Mary bears an extremely heavy burden of proof. She tries to meet this burden of proof by threatening Robert with dire consequences if he does not believe. (Fallacy of force.) but wait, there's more! These consequences are only a possibility if Vuntag actually does exist, so she has to prove the Vuntag exists before she can prove that there is any danger to Robert. (Here she commits the fallacy of begging the question.) Since she doesn't provide any evidence for Vuntag's existence, she loses the argument.

Use your browser's "back" key to return to your place in the reading.

---

This Site is Proudly Hosted By: