(If you are in IME 4020, this is a topic for Dr. Young's side of
the class.)
For this
task you should deeply logically analyze this
topic as described in the following prompt, and, when
you have done that, only then write up a proper
(minumum three page) Thesis
Paper fully describing, clarifying, supporting,
and defending what you presently think is the most
logically supportable conclusion we can come to about
this topic.(Three pages, double spaced, odf, .doc.
.docx, .pdf, submit through Turnitin.com.)
Remember that a thesis paper starts
with your thesis, and does not have an
introduction or a conclusion.
|
Can You Tell if You, Yourself Are Real
Kyla has been your best friend for as long as you can remember.
While you argue and fight like any other pair of friends, you
really understand one another, and have a deep, complex and
satisfying relationship. One day, Kyla says she wants you to come
and meet her parents. She leads you through a door that
mysteriously appears in an apple tree. You find yourself in a
world of tall, strangely shaped buildings, tall strangely
beautiful people and a variety of strange plants and animals.
Nothing
looks right, and you feel
waaaay out of place. After
having a strangely shaped dinner with Kyla s tall, beautiful
parents, you find out that it isn t the 21
st Century
but the 37
th and you re really on the planet
Entelechia, not Earth. The world you just came from, and in which
you ve lived all your life, was actually a holoprogram based
loosely on a 34
th Century soap opera that was vaguely
set between 1900 and 2399. You were not based on any real person,
but were originally written to be someone who Kyla
could
be friends with. (You could have turned out enemies.) Kyla
explains that, since her father just lost his job, they ve had to
turn off the big holoprogram and sell the main projector. But,
since you ve gotten to be such good friends, she s saved her
allowance and bought a microprojector that will keep just you
going as long as she pays for the power you consume. And then she
turns
you off (temporarily) so she can do her homework.
Are you real?
It s true that you have feelings, desires, hopes and
dreams, that you have consciousness and experience yourself as
having free will, but you have all of those things
because a computer program creates them. (It does, however,
create these things by performing exactly the same functions
that a human brain would do.) You don t have an organic body.
You don t have a biological brain. Your program has been copied
from one computer to another several times. When the computer is
turned off, you cease to exist, and if it was erased from the
computer it s on now, you would never exist again. Explain the
best case you can for you being real, and the best case for you
not being real. (Make sure you do not state these cases
as if they are both your personal opinion. You must indicate
that these are arguments that someone might make, and not
necessarily your personal opinion.) Decide which is the logically
stronger case, and explain why.
Specific Instructions (Added
10/11/22)
- Think about what it might mean for
a thing to be real. How are real things different from
unreal things, for instance.
- Think about things real things
can do, that unreal objects cannot do. (For
instance, ghosts cannot hurt people, because ghosts are not
real.)
- Ask yourself is there's anything
you can do that an unreal object would not be able to do.
- Think about reasons someone might
give to argue that you are real.
- Think about reasons someone might
give to argue that you are not real.
- Logically analyze and critique
all of those arguments.
- If there's an argument that doesn't
fail, that's your nonfail argument.
- All the arguments that failed are
your fail arguments.
- Write a paper in which the conclusion of your nonfail
argument is your thesis.
- In that paper, explain your
nonfail argument in detail
- In that paper, explain at
least one fail argument, and explain how it failed in
your prewriting logical analysis.
- If you have any
further thoughts or comments on the topic, add these new
ideas to the end of your paper.
Some Important Points
DO NOT ASSUME THAT BEING A HOLOGRAM MEANS
YOU CAN'T BE REAL.
If you find yourself thinking something like "so am I
really
a hologram?" or "I'll only be real if it turns out I'm not really
a hologram" or "okay, holograms aren't real, so that means I'm not
real," snap out of it! Slap yourself up the side of the head and
stop thinking that way! You're a hologram! That's it! And it
doesn't
automatically mean you're not real! If you think it does, then
you've got to come up with an
argument to the effect
that a thinking, feeling, self-willed being
can't be
real merely because that being is instanciated by means of a
hologram.
Don't attempt this topic unless you can accept at least the
possibility that the meaning of the word "real"
doesn't
automatically include the meaning of "not a hologram." If you want
to argue that being a hologram makes you not real, then you will
sooner or later have to come up with
reasons why being a
hologram makes you not real. Saying "I'm not real because
holograms aren't real" won't cut it unless you can eventually come
up with a reason why we
should define the word "real" in
such a way that it excludes holographic persons. If you can't, you
should say so.
DO NOT PRETEND THAT HOLOGRAPHIC-YOU IS DIFFERENT FROM
BIOLOGICAL-YOU
Remember that the subject of this essay is
you.
You
have not changed in any way. If you want to say things
like "As a hologram, I have no hopes and dreams," remember that
you will also be saying that, as a flesh-and-blood, biological
being, you also have no hopes and dreams. If you had hopes and
dreams before you started the class, holographic-you had exactly
those hopes and dreams. If you have hopes and dreams now,
holographic you has exactly those hopes and dreams right now.
DO NOT PRETEND THAT YOU ARE NOT THE HOLOGRAM
Sometimes students write about "the hologram" as if it's not them.
Don't do this. Use words like "I" and "me" to refer to the
hologram, because the hologram is you.
DO NOT "DEFINE" "BEING REAL"
AS "EXISTING."
You are perfectly welcome to discuss the
definition of the word "real", but if you do, do not
define being real merely as "existing". The words
"real" and "existing" are basically synonyms, and may be used as
such, but this means that when you define the word "real," you
can't just say "a thing is real if it exists." That's not a
definition. To define "real," you have to nsay what the word
means, not just give a different word that means more or less
the same thing.
[Edit] And, as always, do
not go to the internet to read and regurgitate the opinions
of morons.
Follow-up questions.
Don't attempt any of these follow-up questions until you've
at least attempted the main topic. Don't do any follow-up
question unless I've specifically assigned you, or given you
permission, to do that question. If you
want to do a
follow-up question, ask me, and I
might give you
permission. Don't do it if I don't give you permission.
Define Real
Computer Can't
Computer Brain
People We Know
A final note. Sometimes, despite the frequent admotitions given
above, a student will still write something like "I don't think I
could be a hologram because . . ." This student is deliberately
failing the assignment. The assignment says "You are a hologram."
It doesn't give you the option of deciding that you're not a
hologram. Once you do that, the philosophical problem disappears,
and anything you write will be a waste of time.
Copyright 2010 by Martin C. Young
This Site is Proudly Hosted By: