. . . .

For this paper you should deeply logically analyze this topic as described in the following prompt, and, when you have done that, only then write up a proper (minumum three page) Thesis Paper fully describing, clarifying, supporting, and defending what you presently think is the most logically supportable conclusion we can come to about this topic.(Three pages, double spaced, odf, .doc. .docx, .pdf, submit through Turnitin.com.)
    A Thesis Paper starts with a statement of your thesis (or "unthesis") as its very first sentence.
    A Thesis Paper does not have an introduction.
    A Thesis Paper does not have a conclusion.
If you would like more general guidance on how to write a next stage thesis paper, see the follow-up rules.

Defend or Critique the Milgram Studies

Added 9/21/26. The question here is what, if anything, did Milgram prove. It's okay to discuss ethical concerns, but the primary question here is what Milgram's results tell us about what humans will do when an authority figure tells, orders or pressures them to do bad things. Specifically, did Milgram, by whatever means, obtain evidence that humans have a tendency to obey authority, and that tendency can be reinforced by such things as authority symbols, proximity of the authority figure, and the manner in which instructions are given.

Prewriting:

Read at least two of the articles linked below, keeping an open mind, and making notes as you go.

In particular, take note of any specific findings that are mentioned in any of the articles.

As best you can, distinguish between factual and speculative claims about Milgram's work.

As best you can, distinguish between things Milgram actually said, and things that other people say he said.

Try to figure out your own picture of what Milgram did and didn't prove.

Identify exactly one significant criticism of Milgram's work.

Identify the main argument for that criticism.

Identify Milgram's responee to that criticism, or figure out the best thing Milgram could say in response to that criticism.

Logically analyze both the criticism and Milgram's (possible) response.

Try to decide which of the two sides is best supported by the evidence and logic available to you at this time.

Write out all your reasoning, and all the salient points in your notes.

Writing:

Write a thesis statement in which you say what the criticism is, and whether it succeeds or fails, or say that, at this time, you can't decide which side is right.

Add any strictly necessary clarifying comments you can think of.

Clearly and completely explain the criticism in your own words.

Explain the response you think Milgram did or could make in response to this criticism.

Explain which side fails logically and explain why that side fails logically.

Add any pertinent thoughts you have that you have not mentioned before. (Don't repeat anything.)

Check to make sure you didn't break any of the Cardinal Rules.

1. Or, you could write up all the results of your thinking in some other way that doesn't break any of the Cardinal Rules.

Defend or Critique the Milgram Studies

Prewriting:

Writing:

Alternatives:

Articles: