| For this
task you should deeply logically analyze this
topic as described in the following prompt, and, when you
have done that, only then write up a proper
(minumum three page) Thesis
Paper fully describing, clarifying, supporting, and
defending what you presently think is the most logically
supportable conclusion we can come to about this
topic.(Three pages, double spaced, odf, .doc. .docx, .pdf,
submit through Turnitin.com.) Remember that a thesis paper starts with your thesis, and does not have an introduction or a conclusion. |
According to John Rawls, "civil disobedience is a public,
non-violent and conscientious breach of law undertaken with
the aim of bringing about a change in laws or government
policies".Bearing this definition constantly in mind,
please analyze some arguments for and against the moral
allowability of civil disobedience.
If you require more clarity on what civil disobedience is and
isn't, please read the definition of civil disobedience in https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/civil-disobedience/#PrinDis
Your question here is whether civil disobedience is
morally prohibited, morally allowable, or even morally required.
(Odyssey Writing might help with this.)
https://connectusfund.org/19-major-pros-and-cons-of-civil-disobedience
https://www.knowswhy.com/best-arguments-against-civil-disobedience/
https://apecsec.org/5-pros-and-cons-of-civil-disobedience/
https://www.heritage.org/civil-society/report/the-limits-and-dangers-civil-disobedience-the-case-martin-luther-king-jr
https://www.thecollector.com/john-rawls-civil-disobedience/
Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Copyright © 2023 by Martin C. Young
