Can You Tell if You, Yourself Are Real
(If you are in IME 4020, this is a
topic for Dr. Young's side of the class.)
Kyla has been your best friend for as long as you can remember.
While you argue and fight like any other pair of friends, you really
understand one another, and have a deep, complex and satisfying
relationship. One day, Kyla says she wants you to come and meet her
parents. She leads you through a door that mysteriously appears in
an apple tree. You find yourself in a world of tall, strangely
shaped buildings, tall strangely beautiful people and a variety of
strange plants and animals. Nothing looks right, and you
feel waaaay out of place. After having a strangely shaped
dinner with Kyla’s tall, beautiful parents, you find out that it
isn’t the 21st Century but the 37th and you’re
really on the planet Entelechia, not Earth. The world you just came
from, and in which you’ve lived all your life, was actually a
holoprogram based loosely on a 34th Century soap opera
that was vaguely set between 1900 and 2399. You were not based on
any real person, but were originally written to be someone who Kyla
could be friends with. (You could have turned out enemies.)
Kyla explains that, since her father just lost his job, they’ve had
to turn off the big holoprogram and sell the main projector. But,
since you’ve gotten to be such good friends, she’s saved her
allowance and bought a microprojector that will keep just you going
as long as she pays for the power you consume. And then she turns you
off (temporarily) so she can do her homework.
Are you real?
It’s true that you have feelings, desires, hopes and
dreams, that you have consciousness and experience yourself as
having free will, but you have all of those things because
a computer program creates them. (It does, however, create these
things by performing exactly the same functions that a human brain
would do.) You don’t have an organic body. You don’t have a
biological brain. Your program has been copied from one computer
to another several times. When the computer is turned off, you
cease to exist, and if it was erased from the computer it’s on
now, you would never exist again. Explain the best case you can
for you being real, and the best case for you not being
real. (Make sure you do not state these cases as if they are both
your personal opinion. You must indicate that these are arguments
that someone might make, and not necessarily your personal
opinion.) Decide which is the logically stronger case, and
explain why.
Specific Instructions (Added 10/11/22)
- Think about what it might mean for a
thing to be real. How are real things different from unreal
things, for instance.
- Think about things real things can
do, that unreal objects cannot do. (For instance,
ghosts cannot hurt people, because ghosts are not real.)
- Ask yourself is there's anything
you can do that an unreal object would not be able to do.
- Think about reasons someone might
give to argue that you are real.
- Think about reasons someone might
give to argue that you are not real.
- Logically analyze and critique all
of those arguments.
- If there's an argument that doesn't
fail, that's your nonfail argument.
- All the arguments that failed are
your fail arguments.
- Write a paper in which the conclusion of your nonfail
argument is your thesis.
- In that paper, explain your nonfail
argument in detail
- In that paper, explain at
least one fail argument, and explain how it failed in
your prewriting logical analysis.
- If you have any
further thoughts or comments on the topic, add these new ideas
to the end of your paper.
Some Important Points
DO NOT ASSUME THAT BEING A HOLOGRAM MEANS
YOU CAN'T BE REAL.
If you find yourself thinking something like "so am I really
a hologram?" or "I'll only be real if it turns out I'm not really a
hologram" or "okay, holograms aren't real, so that means I'm not
real," snap out of it! Slap yourself up the side of the head and
stop thinking that way! You're a hologram! That's it! And it doesn't
automatically mean you're not real! If you think it does, then
you've got to come up with an argument to the effect that
a thinking, feeling, self-willed being can't be real
merely because that being is instanciated by means of a hologram.
Don't attempt this topic unless you can accept at least the possibility
that the meaning of the word "real" doesn't automatically
include the meaning of "not a hologram." If you want to argue that
being a hologram makes you not real, then you will sooner or later
have to come up with reasons why being a hologram makes you
not real. Saying "I'm not real because holograms aren't real" won't
cut it unless you can eventually come up with a reason why we should
define the word "real" in such a way that it excludes holographic
persons. If you can't, you should say so.
DO NOT PRETEND THAT HOLOGRAPHIC-YOU IS DIFFERENT FROM
BIOLOGICAL-YOU
Remember that the subject of this essay is you. You
have not changed in any way. If you want to say things
like "As a hologram, I have no hopes and dreams," remember that you
will also be saying that, as a flesh-and-blood, biological being,
you also have no hopes and dreams. If you had hopes and dreams
before you started the class, holographic-you had exactly those
hopes and dreams. If you have hopes and dreams now, holographic you
has exactly those hopes and dreams right now.
DO NOT PRETEND THAT YOU ARE NOT THE HOLOGRAM
Sometimes students write about "the hologram" as if it's not them.
Don't do this. Use words like "I" and "me" to refer to the hologram,
because the hologram is you.
DO NOT "DEFINE" "BEING REAL" AS
"EXISTING."
You are perfectly welcome to discuss the
definition of the word "real", but if you do, do not
define being real merely as "existing". The words "real"
and "existing" are basically synonyms, and may be used as such,
but this means that when you define the word "real," you can't
just say "a thing is real if it exists." That's not a definition.
To define "real," you have to nsay what the word means, not just
give a different word that means more or less the same thing.
[Edit] And, as always, do not
go to the internet to read and regurgitate the opinions of
morons.
Follow-up questions.
Don't attempt any of these follow-up questions until you've at
least attempted the main topic. Don't do any follow-up
question unless I've specifically assigned you, or given you
permission, to do that question. If you want to do a
follow-up question, ask me, and I might give you permission.
Don't do it if I don't give you permission.
Define Real
Computer Can't
Computer Brain
People We Know
A final note. Sometimes, despite the frequent admotitions given
above, a student will still write something like "I don't think I
could be a hologram because . . ." This student is deliberately
failing the assignment. The assignment says "You are a hologram." It
doesn't give you the option of deciding that you're not a hologram.
Once you do that, the philosophical problem disappears, and anything
you write will be a waste of time.
Copyright © 2010 by Martin C. Young
This Site is Proudly Hosted By: