You've done a bit of writing, and you think you might be ready to submit, but you're not sure. I can't do previews of papers, but I can give you this checklist by which you can effectively preassess your work.
Did you do an extensive process of prewriting before you set about organizing and finally writing-up your ideas? Or did you simply sit down, open a new document, and start writing a paper with no prewriting? If you didn't do all the proper prewriting, your paper has failed the process check, and should regard what you have now as a "rough draft" that you should not turn in as a finished paper. What you should do if you fail this check is go back, and do prewriting as described in odyssey.htm, using your rough draft only as a source of notes, and write a whole new paper (thesis paper or thinkathon) based on this prewriting.
When you did your prewriting, did you take a long time reading and
thinking about the precise meaning of the instructions in odyssey.htm, and
the prompt for your topic, or did you just glance at the prompt, and then
put your efforts into things that had not much to do with the precise
instructions given in the prompt? If you didn't carefully study and follow
the instructions in the prompt, your paper has failed the attention check,
and you should go back, redo your prewriting on the basis of the
instructions in the prompt, and write a whole new paper
(thesis paper or thinkathon)
based on this new prewriting.
If your paper passes all the previous checks, look at the most important and critical claims made in your paper, and ask if your most important claims are logically supported by the available evidence. (If you're writing a conceptual or logical paper, the "evidence" here would be the definitions given in the prompt, or other relevant facts.) If one of your critical claims is not supported by describable evidence, but is in fact some thing you assert merely because you personally believe it to be true. If one of your critical claims turns out not to be supported by actual evidence you can describe, your paper has failed the evidence check, and you should go back, redo your prewriting without assuming that this claim is true, and write a whole new paper (thesis paper or thinkathon) based on this new prewriting.
If your paper passes all the previous checks, and you have given evidence in an effort to support your most important and critical claims, you should also check to see if the evidence given actually supports those claims. Whether or not a piece of evidence does or does not support a particular claim depends on whether it's possible for the evidence to be true, even if that particular claim is false. For instance, if it is a fact that the vast majority of reporters are liberal, that fact does not support the claim that the media has a liberal bias because it is perfectly possible that those reporters have professional integrity, and do not let their personal views influence their reporting. Similarly, if it is a fact that the vast majority of media barons, those who have complete control over what their channels do and don't report, are conservative, that fact does not support the claim that the media has a conservative bias because it is perfectly possible that those press barons have professional integrity, and do not let their personal views influence their editorial policies. So, if one of your critical claims could still be false even if your evidence is factual, it follows that your paper has failed the logic check, and you should go back, redo your prewriting without assuming that this claim is true, and write a whole new paper (thesis paper or thinkathon) based on this new prewriting.
If your paper was properly prewritten, uses the correct words, and correct definitions, uses evidence properly, and uses good logic, you can check to see if it has a good structure. Make sure that it has no pointless introduction, no repetitive conclusion, and no other unnecessary bits.
Structural failure will not really hurt your grade, but it will introduce a degree of emotional pain into my life, and why would you want to do that?
Basically, this checklist is just another way of asking you to do all the things the prompt tells you to do, and to avoid doing things I tell you not to do. If you did what the assignment said to do, and didn't do any of that other stuff, you're good to go.